One of the issues I have with our modern educational paradigm is that there is an assumption that in learning, children run like trains. That there is a single track they must all travel and that they must reach each train station (or developmental milestone) on time in order to make it to the end of the line (adulthood) on time.
We were initially attracted to unschooling because of its emphasis on trusting children to learn. That we are all born passionate learners and the goal is to not destroy that interest in learning. Expecting children to run on a timetable is highly likely to damage a natural desire to learn because it may force a child ahead of of themselves or push them backwards. Much of what schools do in elementary school can be seen as busywork to keep the students occupied until something clicks and they “get” it.
I remember the experience of my brain suddenly maturing myself. I was considered quite gifted in school and so was given many opportunities to work ahead. Although I was definitely ahead in math, I simply could not wrap my mind around algebra. I tried and tried and cried and studied and could not understand it. Then all of a sudden, it made sense. I was old enough at that point (maybe 12?) that I was capable of a certain level of metacognition and it was fascinating to me that it wasn’t a particular teacher or a particular method of explanation. Over the course of a couple months, it was as if someone had removed cataracts from my brain and I could see what I couldn’t see before.
I was reminded of this today when C was drawing on his magnetic draw board and I realized he wasn’t scribbling. He was drawing a person. ”Draw a Person” is actually a developmental test that doctors and psychologists perform to give an idea of a child’s cognitive development separate from socioeconomic factors (such as exposure to books or museums) or language ability. Basically all the adult does is ask a child to draw a person. Three year olds can make circles and lines but struggle to assemble them into something resembling a person. A four year old (someone who is mentally four years old) will draw a head with arms and legs coming directly out from the head. At five years old, a child will add a body for the arms and legs. Between five and five and a half, kids will start adding more facial features (such as ears), clothes, and three (not five) fingers. This test can be used up through early teens and there is actually a complicated scoring system to determine the cognitive age of the individual based on a number of factors.
So C has never, not once, ever drawn drawn a person before. Of course…he wasn’t supposed to yet. But here’s what surprised me. He announced he was drawing a picture of me:

A drawing of me, tadpole style but with hair, mouth, and eyes
First drawings are often described as “tadpoles” because of the way the legs come out of the head…and sometimes don’t even have arms. C did give me some features right off the bat.

Notice the ears came next, then arms
But he wasn’t done. Next he gave me ears. Then arms.

Here comes a hand
Hands. I even got hands.

I have three fingers on my right hand and three fingers on the left
Now fingers. Three of them, as promised by the developmental specialists. But these aren’t supposed to arrive until a couple years after the initial tadpole and also not til after the body for the arms and legs to attach to. Of note, the three fingers on my left do not have a hand or arm but come directly from my head.
Next came a picture of Daddy. The horizontal lines are Superhubby’s beard. He was given eyes, mouth, nose (though in no particular location on his face), and a pair of shoes. At this point I wondered why neither of us got any clothes if Superhubby is shown wearing shoes, but I didn’t ask because that would have spoiled the whole experience of seeing what C would do on his own.

And here’s Daddy as a tadpole with eyes, mouth and a beard
I’ve been pondering why Superhubby was given a forehead and I wasn’t but then I realized that I have very little visible forehead, esp when my hair isn’t pulled back from my face, but Superhubby has a lot of forehead. My favorite part is Daddy’s right hand (on C’s left), which C said “Is picking his nose.” When I laughed at this, C explained, “He has an owie on his nose so he’s scratching at it.” The left arm (on C’s right and emanating from the beard) has a hand holding “something funny.” C never explained the majority of the dots on the lower portion of the illustration but Daddy did get a pee-pee (“it’s small Mama, because this is about when Daddy was little”) and a kitten on the ground beside him (C’s left and Daddy’s right).

Here’s the final version of Daddy
What a reminder that development happens when it happens! Who knows when C will just out of the blue reach some sort of milestone? Or if the milestones will be sequential (like the fingers showing up before the body). Children are not stuck on a single track of development and they change by fits and starts. Our job as parents is to provide an enriching environment and support their learning. While I do feel some children could use a little extra help sometimes, I think the majority of kids will do just fine if allowed to develop at their own pace.










We have deep shelves over the fridge that are tall enough to hold large plastic bins (one of the perks of the standard 9 foot ceilings in bungalows). Everything that is used less than every week or so is organized into these bins. That would include everything from cake pans to my krumkake iron. This is the least convenient part of our arrangement as I have to ask Superhubby to get down anything I need but it keeps everything clean and ready to use at a moment’s notice.






